Dissidence Case Against Samajwadi Party MP Over Taliban Remarks
Shafiqur Barq’s comment was met with wild analysis from Deputy UP Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya, who contrasted it with Pak PM Imran Khan’s remark after the fall of Kabul.
A subversion body of evidence hosts been documented against a Samajwadi Gathering MP and two others in Uttar Pradesh’s Sambhal region over supposed comments that contrast the Taliban with India’s political dissidents
“A case was enlisted toward the end of last night against Shafiqur Rahman Barq and two others for provocative remarks about the Taliban. The complainant said the Taliban was contrasted with Indian political dissidents and their triumph was observed,” Charkhesh Mishra, the Superintendent of Police in Chambhal region, said in a video articulation delivered today.
“The Taliban is a psychological militant association according to the Indian government and this (the supposed comments) can be considered dissidence. We have recorded a FIR (first data report),” he added.
On Monday, the Samajwadi Party’s Shafiqur Barq – the Lok Sabha MP from Sambhal – purportedly told correspondents the Taliban “need Afghanistan to be free” and “need to run their own country”.
As per news offices, Barq considered the Taliban a ‘power that didn’t permit Russia or the US to set up a good foundation for themselves in Afghanistan’, and said the psychological militant gathering’s activities were ‘an interior matter’.
“They need to be free. This is their own matter. How might we meddle?” he supposedly additionally said that when the British involved India, ‘the whole nation battled for freedom’.
Nonetheless, Barq today gave an assertion saying he didn’t offer any such comment and that whatever he had said had been confounded.
“I didn’t offer any such expression (contrasting Taliban and Indian political dissidents). My assertion has been misconstrued. I’m a resident of India, not of Afghanistan… so I’ve no business with what’s going on there. I support my administration’s strategies,” he was cited by news offices.
It was grumbled that MP Shafiqur Rahman Barq contrasted Taliban with India’s political dissidents. Such articulations qualify as subversion. So FIR enlisted against him u/s 124A (subversion), 153A, 295 IPC. Two others expressed comparable things in a FB video, they’ve likewise been reserved: Sambhal SP.
At the point when India was under British guideline, our nation battled for opportunity. Presently Taliban needs to free their nation and run it. Taliban is a power that didn’t permit even solid nations like Russia and America to get comfortable their country: Shafiqur Rahman Barq, Samajwadi Party MP from Sambhal.
I didn’t offer any such expression (contrasting Taliban and Indian political dissidents). My assertion has been confounded. I’m a resident of India, not of #Afghanistan, so I’ve no business with what’s going on there. I support my govt’s arrangements: SP MP Shafiqur Rahman Barq.
The comment was met with furious analysis from Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya, who contrasted it with Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan’s remark after the fall of Kabul.
“Anything can occur in the Samajwadi Party. There are individuals who can’t sing ‘Jana Gana Mana’… somebody may uphold the Taliban, others could even out charges on police after fear mongers are gotten. This is conciliation,” he said outside the Assembly working in Lucknow.
“On the off chance that this explanation has been given (Mr Maurya said he had not actually heard the supposed proclamation) then, at that point there is no distinction between that individual and Imran Khan,” he added.
The Taliban assumed compelling responsibility for Afghanistan Sunday after President Ashraf Ghani escaped and the dread gathering strolled into Kabul with no resistance.
It covered a stunningly quick defeat of Afghanistan’s significant urban communities in only 10 days, accomplished with somewhat little carnage, following twenty years of war that guaranteed countless lives.
On Monday Imran Khan said: “… in Afghanistan… they have broken the shackles of subjection.”